An Ongoing Discussion.
Words.
"Mitt Romney
is the most improbable of presidential candidates: a weak juggernaut.
He is poised to sweep every primary contest — a first for a
non-incumbent. And yet, in Republican ranks there's an abiding sense
that he should be beatable — and beaten.
It's not that Romney doesn't have fans. His events here in New Hampshire
are packed to the rafters and feel like general election rallies. He's
surging in polls in South Carolina and Florida.
And yet the non-Mitt mood just won't go away. Indeed, it's intensifying.
... His authentic inauthenticity problem isn't going away. And it's sapping
enthusiasm from the rank and file. The turnout in Iowa was disastrously
low, barely higher than the turnout in 2008 — and if Ron Paul hadn't brought thousands of non-Republicans
to the caucus sites, it would have been decidedly lower than in 2008.
That's an ominous sign given how much enthusiasm there should be for
making Obama a one-term president. It's almost as if Romney's banality
is infectious.
...The most persuasive case for Romney has always been that if he's the
nominee, the election will be a referendum on Obama. But that
calculation always assumed that rank-and-file Republicans would vote for
their nominee in huge numbers no matter what. That may well still be
the case, but it feels less guaranteed every day..."
LOS ANGELES TIMES: Romney's authenticity problem
No comments:
Post a Comment